For companies and foundations
The funder side of the same lifecycle
Employee giving, matching queues, sponsorships and grant payments are the other end of the contribution Beneora already models. Prototypes exist; this is deliberately Release 2 work.
- TodayMatching requests arrive by email, are approved in a spreadsheet, and reach the nonprofit as an unexplained lump sum.
- The gapThe nonprofit cannot tie the payment to the employee gifts it matched, so soft credit is guesswork.
- The opportunityIf both sides share the object model, matching reconciles itself.
Gift received
Recurring · Winter Shelter (restricted)
Processor fee
2.9% + $0.30 · card
Net to payout
Payout PO-2261 · settles T+2
Bank deposit
Matched batch of 21 gifts
Fund allocation
Winter Shelter · restriction honoured
What changes
The specific difference, not a benefit list
Each card names the operational change, not an outcome we cannot prove for you.
- What changes
Matching that arrives explained
A matched payment references the employee gifts it matches, so soft credit and receipting are correct on arrival.
- What changes
Sponsorship and grant payments as commitments
Modelled as pledges with schedules, so both sides see what is owed and what has arrived.
- What changes
Impact reporting the funder can read
The same evidence chain the nonprofit publishes, scoped to the funder's contributions.
The same week, twice
How a companies & foundations week runs before and after
Left is the week as this seat describes it today. Right is the same week once the record carries the terms. Nothing on the right is claimed as available — the status badge above governs that.
Today
- TodayMatching requests arrive by email, are approved in a spreadsheet, and reach the nonprofit as an unexplained lump sum.
- The gapThe nonprofit cannot tie the payment to the employee gifts it matched, so soft credit is guesswork.
- The opportunityIf both sides share the object model, matching reconciles itself.
Prepared
- 1Matching that arrives explainedA matched payment references the employee gifts it matches, so soft credit and receipting are correct on arrival.
- 2Sponsorship and grant payments as commitmentsModelled as pledges with schedules, so both sides see what is owed and what has arrived.
- 3Impact reporting the funder can readThe same evidence chain the nonprofit publishes, scoped to the funder's contributions.
Described state, governed by the status label on this page.
Where you work
The surfaces you would live in
Company dashboard
Employee giving, matching queue and sponsorship commitments.
Matching queue
Requests with the employee gifts they reference.
Not ready yet
What we cannot do for you today
- This is Release 2. Company and foundation surfaces exist as labelled prototypes on illustrative data.
- Grant compliance management is explicitly out of scope.
Metrics this seat owns
- Match completion rate
- Time from request to matched payment
- Correctly attributed soft credits
One sentence
The funder side of the same lifecycle
Employee giving, matching queues, sponsorships and grant payments are the other end of the contribution Beneora already models. Prototypes exist; this is deliberately Release 2 work.
Matching requests arrive by email, are approved in a spreadsheet, and reach the nonprofit as an unexplained lump sum.
Other seats
Same lifecycle, different vantage point
Design-partner program
Tell us what companies & foundations needs first
We are working with a small number of US and Canadian nonprofits who feel the reconciliation and donor-data pain most acutely. Partners shape the sequence, see the honest status of every module, and are never charged for a capability that is still a prototype.