For growing nonprofits
You outgrew the form. You cannot afford the implementation.
Between a donation widget and an enterprise suite sits an organization with several giving streams, real recurring revenue and no capacity for a six-month rollout. That organization is who we build for.
- Symptom oneThree tools each hold part of the donor, and the join between them is a person with a spreadsheet.
- Symptom twoYour last software evaluation ended because the implementation cost more than the software.
- Symptom threeGrowth added reconciliation and reporting work faster than it added capacity.
Gift received
Recurring · Winter Shelter (restricted)
Processor fee
2.9% + $0.30 · card
Net to payout
Payout PO-2261 · settles T+2
Bank deposit
Matched batch of 21 gifts
Fund allocation
Winter Shelter · restriction honoured
What changes
The specific difference, not a benefit list
Each card names the operational change, not an outcome we cannot prove for you.
- What changes
One lifecycle instead of five integrations
Giving, donor data, commitments, reconciliation and impact are one system's responsibility, so the joins are not your job.
- What changes
Setup measured in days
Guided organization setup, a live form and imported donors as the first milestone — not a discovery phase.
- What changes
Work that reduces, not shifts
Donor self-service, automatic gift application and evidence-carrying exceptions remove staff hours rather than relocating them.
- What changes
Honest scope
You are told which modules are real and which are prototypes before you commit, and you are never charged for a prototype.
The same week, twice
How a growing nonprofits week runs before and after
Left is the week as this seat describes it today. Right is the same week once the record carries the terms. Nothing on the right is claimed as available — the status badge above governs that.
Today
- Symptom oneThree tools each hold part of the donor, and the join between them is a person with a spreadsheet.
- Symptom twoYour last software evaluation ended because the implementation cost more than the software.
- Symptom threeGrowth added reconciliation and reporting work faster than it added capacity.
Prepared
- 1One lifecycle instead of five integrationsGiving, donor data, commitments, reconciliation and impact are one system's responsibility, so the joins are not your job.
- 2Setup measured in daysGuided organization setup, a live form and imported donors as the first milestone — not a discovery phase.
- 3Work that reduces, not shiftsDonor self-service, automatic gift application and evidence-carrying exceptions remove staff hours rather than relocating them.
- 4Honest scopeYou are told which modules are real and which are prototypes before you commit, and you are never charged for a prototype.
Described state, governed by the status label on this page.
Where you work
The surfaces you would live in
Guided setup
Organization, funds, forms and users in a checklist that reports what is missing.
Import
Mapped donor and gift import with a dry run before anything is written.
Core lifecycle
Gifts, donors, commitments, reconciliation and impact in one place.
Export
Full export of your donors, gifts, pledges and reconciliation records.
Not ready yet
What we cannot do for you today
- Beneora is not yet production software. Identity and organization records persist; the lifecycle modules are prototypes.
- Pricing is being validated with design partners and is not final.
Metrics this seat owns
- Time to first live form
- Staff hours per 1,000 gifts
- Technology cost as a share of funds raised
One sentence
You outgrew the form. You cannot afford the implementation.
Between a donation widget and an enterprise suite sits an organization with several giving streams, real recurring revenue and no capacity for a six-month rollout. That organization is who we build for.
Three tools each hold part of the donor, and the join between them is a person with a spreadsheet.
Other seats
Same lifecycle, different vantage point
Design-partner program
Bring your growing nonprofits workflow to a partner session
We are working with a small number of US and Canadian nonprofits who feel the reconciliation and donor-data pain most acutely. Partners shape the sequence, see the honest status of every module, and are never charged for a capability that is still a prototype.